Breaking News! This just in: scientist attributed to researching for/with National Geographic are now getting behind de-bunking Global Warming. (I refrain from putting quotes around it, though I apply that much wanna-be quality to the scare tactics it has ensued) Regardless, in the last days it has been noted by NG that maybe, actually...uh, Carbon Dioxide is really good for the planet! The increased temperature is actually beneficial to the growth and rejuvenation of land. Really, the trend we are now in is just part of the Natural Trend. 'The majority of the warming is due to the earth's tendency unrelated to human behavior.'
To further the explanation in laymen's terms: CO2 produces heat. Heat holds moisture. Moisture makes rain. Any five year old watching a seed grow in a paper cup can tell you how important this is.
The scare-tactics used to illustrate human behavior of global warming have not been for the benefit of the planet like our policy makers would like us to believe. It has been once again (follow the money) another step towards manipulating policy for pocket-lining and the taking away of individual rights further. Im not saying it isnt a good idea to not be wasteful and reduce the use of plastic (or any non-biodegradable product) in your household. But this is a sliding slope worth noting. The mass-production of food for the 'feeding frenzy' that we are under is ironically causing malnutrition in our own country, because it's deliberately produced to be void of vitamins and minerals, which decreases health, which increases doctor's visits, which increases money in pockets of insurance company's and prescription drug manufacturers.
When you try and act "green" and grow your own vegetables and fruits in your own backyard...eventually this will be regulated. Either you wont be allowed or you will have to purchase a permit!! Im not bullshiting you here.
Here is what should increase the steam boil inside. The warmth producing rain is mainly falling in the once most barren of land, the continent Africa. (and other under-nourished parts of India) You know...that place where people are starving from malnutrition, infertile soil, diseases of 'epidemic' proportion!! The United Nations and The World Health Organization can no longer ask for the preposterous sums of money if the continent ever becomes self-sufficient. If you want to really acknowledge how manipulative the WHO is, look up what they define as "The Aids Epidemic" in which they need mass sums of money to help cure; its a list of the same symptoms as the common-cold, granted a communicable disease...not a deadly virus! I wont even use this post to expound on the uselessness and waste that is The United Nations.
Here is a direct quote cited by a scientist working out of The Idso Center for the Study of Carbon Dioxide and Global Change, back during the Clinton administration (a long time in the making... Mr.Al Gore, VP)
'The United States, and the United Nations, have taken the position that increasing CO2 levels are dangerous and must be stopped. But given the greening theory it might be even more dangerous to do this, because it could lead to mass starvation in the poorer countries of the worlds, where most people live. The U.S. and UN appear to be ducking this incredibly important issue because they have already made up their minds what they want to do.'
There is alot more to this and ALOT more coming. Leave a comment if you want; debate me if you dare.
http://westernfrontamerica.com/2009/03/02/high-price-climate-lies/
http://www.climatedepot.com/a/2355/Rising-CO2-a-Boon-for-Biosphere-ndash-Earth-in-CO2-Famine-ndash-Cutting-CO2-a-profoundly-evil-act--Climate-Depot-Fact-Sheet-on-CO2
"Environmental organizations are doing their predictable routine, and garnering megabucks A lot of money! from gullible foundations, [aided by] the amen chorus of the New YorkNew York, state, United StatesNew York, Middle Atlantic state of the United States. It is bordered by Vermont, Massachusetts, Connecticut, and the Atlantic Ocean (E), New Jersey and Pennsylvania (S), Lakes Erie and Ontario and the Canadian province of ..... Click the link for more information. Times, Washington Post, and even National Geographic and Scientific American Scientific AmericanU.S. monthly magazine interpreting scientific developments to lay readers. It was founded in 1845 as a newspaper describing new inventions. By 1853 its circulation had reached 30,000 and it was reporting on various sciences, such as astronomy and . They seem to be impervious to the growing body of scientific evidence that defines Global Warming as a non-problem." While warning about the harm to America that would follow adoption of the Kyoto Protocol, Dr. S Dr.Doctor.
dr.dram. . Fred Singer, a top environmental scientist and former director of the U.S. Weather Satellite Service, continued his campaign against global warming "hysteria."
http://www.thefreelibrary.com/
The greatest book covering ALL the HYPE http://books.google.com/books?id=X3XD9VwhETkC&dq=national+geographic+scientist+on+global+warming&printsec=frontcover&source=in&hl=en&ei=P6eDSrnHFZS_lAeq89XABQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=12#v=onepage&q=&f=false
http://nov55.com/words.html
Well, well, well, imagine an AGW supporter exaggerating and emotionalizing to make their point, and (of all things) the BBC gets the admission:
"Leipold’s admission that Greenpeace issued misleading information is a major embarrassment to the organization, which often has been accused of alarmism but has always insisted that it applies full scientific rigor in its global-warming pronouncements.
Although he admitted Greenpeace had released inaccurate but alarming information, Leipold defended the organization’s practice of “emotionalizing issues” in order to bring the public around to its way of thinking and alter public opinion."
Big Hollywood » Blog Archive » EXCLUSIVE: Lies Revealed — Greenpeace Leader Admits Arctic Ice Exaggeration
Source link on your own organic production
http://www.douglassreport.com/dailydose/dd200908/dd20090816a.html
Can you post the references to this article, I would like to read further into this theory. Thx
ReplyDelete